Surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma larger than 5 cm in diameter: A case report and review of the literature
Case Report
Surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma larger than 5 cm in diameter: A case report and review of the literature
Xuefei Sun, Jiabang Wang, Guotao Yang
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Guotao Yang, MD. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. No. 107, Wenhua West Road, Jinan 250012, China. Tel/Fax: +86-531-82169114. Email: yanggtxwk@163.com
Abstract
Although leiomyoma is the most common benign esophageal neoplasm, it is a rare condition. Resection of the tumor is recommended in symptomatic patients, and observation is recommended in asymptomatic patients with small lesions. We discussed here a patient admitted to our hospital for dyspepsia in whom a calcified mediastinal neoplasm was diagnosised preoperatively and esophageal leiomyoma was diagnosised postoperatively. Enucleation of a leiomyoma of the esophagus is recommended and the optimal approaches should be tailored based on the location and size of the tumor.
Key words
Benign esophageal tumor; enucleation; esophageal leiomyoma
J Thorac Dis 2012;4(3):323-326. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.11.02
Introduction
Benign tumors of the esophagus are rare and leiomyoma is the most common benign tumor of the esophagus (1). It is reported that most leiomyomas originate the inner circular muscle layer of the distal and midthoracic esophagus, particularly at the esophagogastric junction (2,3). Middle-aged men are most frequently affected (4,5). The main symptoms usually are dysphagia and epigastric pain, but they are not specific for the disease. The size of the esophageal leiomyoma may change, a size of 1 to 29 cm has been defined in the literature (1,6,7). But most of them was samller than 5 cm in diameter. Tumor that size lager than 5cm are rare. It was easily misdiagnosised as mediastinal mass, esophageal cancer (8) and esophageal stromal tumor. Its clinical feature and management are differente with other smaller esophageal leiomyoma. Here, a patient with large calcified esophageal leiomyoma who was treated in our institute is presented, initial discuss its diagnosis and management against the background of previously published cases and series.
Case report
A 42-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with dyspepsia and esophageal reflux. There was no nausea, vomiting, or weight loss. Results of a physical examination and standard laboratory tests were normal. A chest radiograph showed a mass in the right low mediastum, and a filling defect was apparent on esophagography. Computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the chest revealed a completely calcified 70×60 mm mass at the right lower posterior mediastinum narrowing the esophagus lumen and the cacified benign mediastinal neoplasm was diagnosis (Figure 1A and 1B). Growth over the organ borders or infiltration in neighboring structures was not detected. There were no enlarged lymph nodes, and there was no evidence for distant metastases. A right thoracotomy was performed. During surgical exploration, a unregular cacified mass in the distal esophagus (Figure 1C). The mass was enucleated completely. Histopathologic examination revealed a tumor of 70×60×50 mm and cacified spindle cell fascicles without mitosis or atypia was observed (Figure 1D).
Figure 1. (A/B): Computerized tomography (CT) scanning of the chest revealed a completely calcified 70×60 mm mass at the right lower post mediastinum; (C): A solitary esophageal leiomyoma with a ginger-like shape after enucleation; (D): Histopathologic examination revealed cacified spindle cell fascicles without mitosis or atypia (HE×100) course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged subjectively free of complaints on the 9th postoperative day.
Discussion
Leiomyomas are benign tumors descending from smooth muscle cells of the esophagus. They are the most common benign tumors of the esophagus and they may occur in all parts of the esophagus, but 60% occur in the distal third, 30% in the middle, and 10% in the proximal esophagus (4). Although gastrointestinal bleeding is a common finding in gastric leiomyomas, esophageal leiomyomas rarely bleed, which may be because they do not ulcerate (9). Leiomyomas grow slowly, and half of the patients are asymptomatic and the symptoms are not specific. Dysphagia with concomitant epigastric pain or retrosternal burning usually appears when the tumor's diameter becomes larger than the critical point of 4.5-5 cm (10). It seemed that the size of tumor correlates with the severity of the symptoms, but larger leiomyoma usually grow toward outside of esophageal lumen. So dysphagia don't always proportionate to the size of tumor in larger leiomyoma. In our report, the symptoms were dyspepsia and esophageal reflux.
The diagnosis of esophageal leiomyoma is mostly not clear preoperatively. It may present as a mediastinal mass on chest radiograph and may be seen as an incidental radiologic finding. Differential diagnoses include foreign oppressed desease of esophagus, malignant esophageal tumors such as squamous or adenomatous carcinomas or leiomyosarcoma and other benign tumors. Barium swallow is the most commonly used radiologic test for esophageal lesions (4). The finding on barium swallow is a smooth filling defect in esophageal lumen without a mucosal abnormality. More esophagus was involved in large esophageal leiomyoma, the mucosa of diseased region become thinnings, and show hyperaemia. So it can be regarded as mucosa destroy when barium swallow examination, that misdiagnosis as esophageal cancer (8) or esophageal stromal tumor. Computed Tomography scans of the chest show in most cases a mass originating from esophagus without mediastinal lymphadenopathy, but in giant leiomyoma, tumor usually grow toward outside of esophageal lumen. To form soft tissue shadow in mediastinum, it can be misdiagnosised as mediastinal mass. The diagnosis is difficault to do and may cause diagnostic confusion. So to posterior mediastinum mass that close neighbor esophagus, it maybe a esophageal leiomyoma, this is worthy think highly (11). Esophagoscopy is also used for the diagnosis of esophageal leiomyoma, but it only shows submucosal lesions and will not lead to an accurate diagnosis (4,12). The use of the EUS can clearly reveal the structure of the esophageal wall. On EUS, leiomyoma presents as a homogeneous and hypoechoic lesion with clear margins, surrounded by a hyperechoic area (12), which can easily be differentiated from a lipoma, cyst, or hemangioma in the esophageal wall. Preoperative biopsy of the tumor is a debating issue (13). Our policy is not to recommend it, because the tumor is easily adhesive to the mucosa and the mucosal damage occurs accidentally during enucleation. Moreover, in many cases biopsy could not provide enough material to establish an accurate histopathological diagnosis.
Once the clinical diagnosis of leiomyoma is established, many factors must be considered for the optimal treatment. Tumor size and location are important, but also the patient’s symptoms, general condition, and comorbidities should be taken into account. The surgical indications of these tumors include unremitting symptoms, increased tumor size, mucosal ulceration, histopathologic diagnosis, and facilitation of other surgical procedures (7). Because malignant transformation in leiomyomas is rare, some authors recommend regular follow-up with barium swallow and endoscopy for asymptomatic patients with lesions smaller than 5 cm and when the preoperative workup has excluded malignancy (7,13). We suggest that a leiomyoma should be removed when diagnosed even when asymptomatic, because there is always the possibility, rarely though, of malignant transformation.
For leiomyoma, the location and size of the tumor are important factors in determining the appropriate surgical approach. Endoscopic approaches appear possible in case of small pedunculated tumors of 2–4 cm originating from the muscularis mucosae (14). Usually to execute endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Symptomatic small leiomyomas <5 cm can be enucleated either by open surgery (15,16) or by means of videoassisted thoracoscopy (VATS) (17). Transthoracic extramucosal blunt enucleation via a left- or right-sided thoracotomy is the most common procedure for small- to midsized esophageal leiomyoma, which is easier, faster, and safer compared to resection (1,7). Low tumors and tumors of the esophago-gastric junction can be approached via upper midline laparotomy (15). After nucleation, the muscular wall should be closed to avoid diverticular-like mucosal bulging and for the preservation of the muscular propulsing activity. The larger the tumor that diameter >5 cm, associated with muscle atrophy and more muscular defects. The muscular wall should be repaied with pedunculated pleural film, diaphragm valve, or omentum, lung, pericardium. Postoperation feeding time should be delayed to avoid fistula, diverticula. Strengthen the lower esophageal mucosa, esophageal mucosa even weak are protected, and can effectively prevent to form postoperative gastric acid reflux and esophageal diverticulum. For giant esophageal leiomyoma should be preferred esophageal resection and reconstruction surgery, not the same as conventional enucleation of tumor. Because: (i) It was technically difficult to only enucleate giant leiomyoma, and the defect of esophageal muscle can’t ensure wound healing; (ii) esophageal muscle was pressed by giant leiomyoma that expansive growth, became thinning and membranous. So lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction or loss. Iterature has reported that patients after removal of giant leiomyoma prone to symptoms of reflux esophagitis (18); (iii) For giant esophageal leiomyoma, it may have leiomyosarcoma-like transformation or with small leiomyosarcoma-like lesions (19); (iv) Meanwhile, the huge tumor endangered the physical health of patients by dysphagia. Or may be combined esophageal cancer (20), so as soon as possible surgery. To perform partial or subtotal resection of the esophagus, and esophagogastric anastomosis, the results are satisfactory. In our patient, because of the size, the location and the confusion diagnosis of the tumor, it was extramucosal blunt enucleated using thoracotomic approach.
IIn conclusion, diagnosis of esophageal leiomyomas requires both endoscopic and radiologic examinations. Once the clinical diagnosis of leiomyoma is established, the operation should be performed to remove the tumor.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by Shandong Province Science and Technology Program (No. 2007GG20002009) and Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (No. Y2007C038).
References
  • Aurea P, Grazia M, Petrella F, Bazzocchi R. Giant leiomyoma of the esophagus. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002;22:1008-10.[LinkOut]
  • SCHMIDT HW, CLAGETT OT, HARRISON EG Jr. Benign tumors and cysts of the esophagus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1961;41:717-32.[LinkOut]
  • Mutrie CJ, Donahue DM, Wain JC, Wright CD, Gaissert HA, Grillo HC, et al. Esophageal leiomyoma: a 40-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1122-5.[LinkOut]
  • Peters JH, DeMeester TR. Esophagus and diaphragmatic hernia. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen KD, Billiar RT, Dunn LD, Hunter GC, Pollock RE, eds. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005; 906.
  • Choong CK, Meyers BF. Benign esophageal tumors: introduction, incidence, classification, and clinical features. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;15:3-8.[LinkOut]
  • Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Virchows Arch 2001;438:1-12.[LinkOut]
  • Priego P, Lobo E, Alonso N, Gil Olarte MA, Pérez de Oteyza J, Fresneda V. Surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma: an analysis of our experience. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2006;98:350-8.[LinkOut]
  • Wang Y, Zhang R, Ouyang Z, Zhang D, Wang L, Zhang D. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2002;24:394-6.[LinkOut]
  • Jang KM, Lee KS, Lee SJ, Kim EA, Kim TS, Han D, et al. The spectrum of benign esophageal lesions: imaging findings. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:199-210.[LinkOut]
  • Chak A. EUS in submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:S43-8.[LinkOut]
  • Wallace MB, Hoffman BJ, Sahai AS, Inoue H, Van Velse A, Hawes RH. Imaging of esophageal tumors with a water-filled condom and a catheter US probe. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:597-600.[LinkOut]
  • Xu GQ, Zhang BL, Li YM, Chen LH, Ji F, Chen WX, et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography for gastrointestinal leiomyoma. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:2088-91.[LinkOut]
  • Punpale A, Rangole A, Bhambhani N, Karimundackal G, Desai N, de Souza A, et al. Leiomyoma of esophagus. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;13:78-81.[LinkOut]
  • Kajiyama T, Sakai M, Torii A, Kishimoto H, Kin G, Uose S, et al. Endoscopic aspiration lumpectomy of esophageal leiomyomas derived from the muscularis mucosae. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:417-22.[LinkOut]
  • Lee LS, Singhal S, Brinster CJ, Marshall B, Kochman ML, Kaiser LR, et al. Current management of esophageal leiomyoma. J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:136-46.[LinkOut]
  • Al-Shanafey S, Cartier Y, Stiles GE, Casson AG. Circumferential giant leiomyoma of the esophagus. J Am Coll Surg 2001;193:453.[LinkOut]
  • Taniguchi E, Kamiike W, Iwase K, Nishida T, Akashi A, Ohashi S, et al. Thoracoscopic enucleation of a large leiomyoma located on the left side of the esophageal wall. Surg Endosc 1997;11:280-2.[LinkOut]
  • O'Hanlon DM, Clarke E, Lennon J, Gorey TF. Leiomyoma of the esophagus. Am J Surg 2002;184:168-9.[LinkOut]
  • Sabbah F, Oudanane M, Ehirchiou A, Raiss M, Hrora A, Benamer A, et al. Leiomyoma of the esophagus. Presse Med 2001;30:1148- 50.[LinkOut]
  • Fu KI, Muto M, Mera K, Sano Y, Nagashima F, Tahara M, et al. Carcinoma coexisting with esophageal leiomyoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:272-3.[LinkOut]
Cite this article as: Sun X, Wang J, Yang G. Surgical treatment of esophageal leiomyoma larger than 5 cm in diameter: A case report and review of the literature. J Thorac Dis 2012;4(3):323-326. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2011.11.02